{"id":1891,"date":"2025-08-11T23:21:06","date_gmt":"2025-08-11T23:21:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.vecimasupport.com\/?p=1891"},"modified":"2025-08-12T00:32:38","modified_gmt":"2025-08-12T00:32:38","slug":"trick-or-treat-congress-faces-chamber-of-horrors-as-government-funding-deadline-looms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.vecimasupport.com\/index.php\/2025\/08\/11\/trick-or-treat-congress-faces-chamber-of-horrors-as-government-funding-deadline-looms\/","title":{"rendered":"Trick or Treat: Congress faces 'chamber of horrors' as government funding deadline looms"},"content":{"rendered":"
It was mid-July. And the House of Representatives<\/a> was already done for the summer.\u00a0<\/p>\n That\u2019s right around the same time Halloween decorations like gigantic yard skeletons and Reese\u2019s peanut butter and chocolate pumpkins began materializing in stores.<\/p>\n Those weren\u2019t phantasms. Halloween is the next big consumer holiday on the calendar.<\/p>\n I mean, what would you buy to decorate for Labor Day?\u00a0<\/p>\n But there\u2019s a spooky alignment between July and Halloween when it comes to Congress. If you begin to see Halloween paraphernalia in July, that\u2019s practically October in Capitol Hill terms. The reason? Congress didn\u2019t finish<\/a> its annual spending bills before the annual August recess and that means it will be a sprint to finish them by October 1, the deadline to avoid a government shutdown.<\/p>\n GRIDLOCK CRUMBLES AS SENATE ADVANCES SPENDING BILLS IN RACE AGAINST SHUTDOWN<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Right around the same time that the rest of the nation starts thinking about ghosts and goblins for Halloween.\u00a0<\/p>\n The funding deadline is enough to convert the U.S. Capitol into a chamber of horrors for the entire month of September. Congress is always dragging to complete<\/a> spending measures in July. Then August comes and concerns about the spending bills vanish like a ghost. Then the appropriations bills rise like mummies out of their coffins when Congress comes back in September. The battle over averting a government shutdown is like a vampire. It sucks most other legislative activity out of Congress until there\u2019s a deal. That\u2019s because most Members want no part of a government shutdown. Lawmakers from both sides know that government funding is one of the most important inflection points on the political calendar.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s examine where we stand with government funding.\u00a0<\/p>\n Congress approved a stopgap spending bill to avert a government shutdown in March. That interim spending package funded the government through September 30, the end of the federal fiscal year. The House approved the bill. But lawmakers worried about a potential government shutdown because breaking a filibuster on the measure required 60 votes. That entailed support of some Democrats since Republicans only have 53 votes in the Senate.\u00a0<\/p>\n At the last minute, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced he would help Republicans crack the filibuster. Schumer didn\u2019t vote yes on the bill itself. But the New York Democrat argued that avoiding a shutdown at that point was better than enduring one under President Trump \u2013 and Elon Musk who was then fully empowered at DOGE.<\/p>\n Some longtime Capitol Hill hands and Congressional observers feared the government might shutter for a lengthy period if it closed. Schumer and other Democrats asserted that the President and Musk would use that as justification for never re-opening some parts of the government since they lacked funding from Congress.<\/p>\n Progressives excoriated Schumer for not extracting a major concession from President Trump and Congressional Republicans which reflected Democratic values and priorities. Liberals used Schumer\u2019s decision as justification to demand new Democratic leadership in the Senate. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., appeared to seethe at Schumer\u2019s maneuver, sidestepping questions from reporters about the break.<\/p>\n White House Budget Director Russ Vought says he wants a less bipartisan appropriations process. That\u2019s fine. But this is about the math. House Republicans must stick together to pass any spending package there. House Speaker Mike Johnson<\/a>, R-La., can only lose three votes and still pass a bill without Democratic assistance. Likewise, Senate Republicans can only lose three votes there, too. But the real hurdle is the filibuster. That\u2019s where 60 votes are necessary. And that means the GOP must lean on Democrats \u2013 assuming they\u2019re willing to help out.<\/p>\n HILLARY RIPPED AS ‘MASSIVE LIAR’ AFTER SCATHING REACTION TO TRUMP’S PLAN TO FIX DC CRIME<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n It’s really unclear if Republicans can stick together to approve a spending package<\/a>. Keep in mind that it\u2019s almost a certainty that any spending measure must simply renew all current funding on a temporary basis. A lot of Republicans are fed up with this appropriations rut \u2013 especially since Johnson promised to do things differently once he claimed the Speaker\u2019s gavel in October 2023. Remember that some conservatives helped bounce former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., less than two years ago because he propounded an interim spending plan.\u00a0<\/p>\n Some Republicans are beginning to lose patience with Johnson on spending plans. But remember that most Republicans will support whatever appropriations plan the GOP brass concocts \u2013 as long as it has the blessing of President Trump.\u00a0<\/p>\n So Vought may advocate for a more partisan process. But that won\u2019t result in policy achievements and GOP spending priorities unless Republicans convince Democrats to play ball.\u00a0<\/p>\n Here\u2019s another dynamic: some members of the conservative Freedom Caucus are hinting they simply want to re-up the current levels of funding again. Yes, lawmakers approved those spending plans under President Biden and a Democratic Senate. Therefore, much of the federal government is still operating under Democratic spending blueprints. But Democrats would demand more money for the next spending round. The same with some Republicans. So voting to renew the old money \u2013 regardless of who pushed for it \u2013 is less than Congress could have spent. That\u2019s why some Freedom Caucus members suggest this would serve as a de facto spending cut.<\/p>\n They\u2019re not wrong. Federal spending is almost always on an upward trajectory. This would level things off and bend the annual spending curve for the first time in decades.\u00a0<\/p>\n